Adam Wasserman Site

DUE PROCESS DECISIONS


DISCLAIMER
This information is not legal advice or meant to give any guidance to your own particular circumstances. This information is provided for reference and teaching purposes only. Please do not apply these summaries to your legal concerns or challenges.

ESCONDIDO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT v. Student

Significant areas of law

School must prove a specific facility is appropriate for Student even if it is established that Student’s current placement is substantially likely to cause injury to Student and others.

Read More...

CROFTS V. ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Failure to evaluate student for a specific disability requested by parents is not denial of FAPE where the evaluation conducted by school results in framing of appropriate IEP goals to address student’s specific needs.

Read More...

STUDENT v. CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

School may not implement student’s IEP without parental consent when IEP team fails to consider students’ current level of performance while deciding an appropriate placement.

Read More...

STUDENT v. MONROVIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Failure to conduct appropriate assessments despite having notice of student’s special needs and disabilities is denial of FAPE.

Read More...

STUDENT v. ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENATRY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Failure to provide adequate supports and services during distance learning is denial of FAPE.

Read More...
1 5 6 7 8 9 12